4.7 Article

Comparative effect of inorganic N on plant growth and N2 fixation of ten legume crops: towards a better understanding of the differential response among species

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 432, Issue 1-2, Pages 207-227

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-018-3788-1

Keywords

Grain legumes; Plant growth; Nitrogen nutrition; Symbiotic N-2 fixation; Nitrogen use efficiency; Root soil exploration

Funding

  1. INRA
  2. Ministry in charge of Agriculture
  3. ANR LEGITIMES
  4. INRA Bourgogne-Franche-Comte Region (PSDR project ProSys)
  5. European Community [FP7-613551]
  6. Terres Inovia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsA better understanding of how plant growth, N nutrition and symbiotic nitrogen fixation (SNF) are influenced by soil inorganic N availability, for a wide range of legume species, is crucial to optimise legume productivity, N-2 fixation, while limiting environmental risks such as N leaching.MethodsA comparative analysis was performed for ten legume crops, grown in a field experiment and supplied with four N fertiliser rates. Dry matter, N concentration and SNF were measured. In parallel, root elongation rates were studied in a greenhouse experiment.ResultsFor most species, N fertilisation had little effect on plant growth and N accumulation. SNF was reduced by soil inorganic N available at sowing but with large differences in the magnitude of the response among species. The response varied according to plant N requirements for growth and plant ability to retrieve inorganic N. Accordingly, root lateral expansion rate measured in RhizoTubes was highly correlated with plant ability to retrieve inorganic N measured in the field experiment.ConclusionCombining SNF response to soil inorganic N, shoot N and plant ability to retrieve inorganic N, allowed a robust evaluation of differential response to soil inorganic N among a wide range of legume species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available