4.7 Article

Plant functional group influences arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal abundance and hyphal contribution to soil CO2 efflux in temperate grasslands

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 432, Issue 1-2, Pages 157-170

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-018-3789-0

Keywords

Carbon cycle; Defoliation; Hyphal production efficiency; Mowing; Soil respiration

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31501996]
  2. Basic research program of Jiangsu province (Natural Science Foundation) - Youth Foundation [BK20150665, BK20160738]
  3. Research Funds for the Central Universities [KJQN201601]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aimsArbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are abundant in grassland ecosystem. We assessed AM hyphal contributions to soil CO2 efflux across plant functional groups to better quantify AM fungal influences on soil carbon dynamics.MethodsWe conducted a field experiment using in-growth mesocosms to partition soil CO2 efflux from roots, AM hyphae, and free-living soil microbes associated with C-3 grasses, C-4 grasses, forbs, and diverse plant communities from May to August in 2017.ResultsAM hyphae contributed <10% to total soil respiration in forb communities and diverse plant communities but accounted for as much as 32% in C-3 grasses. Plant functional groups differed in hyphal production efficiencies (the ratio of AM hyphal length to aboveground biomass), with the lowest in C-3 grasses (0.470.15mg(-1)) and the greatest in forbs (3.27 +/- 0.55mg(-1)). Mowing reduced hyphal production efficiency of C-4 grasses and forbs but did not affect total soil respiration. AM hyphal and microbial respiration peaked at the middle of the growing season, however there was no significant seasonal variation in root respiration.Conclusion p id=Par4 AM hyphal respiration is an important pathway of carbon flux from plants to atmosphere. Shifts in plant community composition can influence soil carbon processes by regulating hyphal production and respiration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available