4.7 Article

Do soil enzymes respond to long-term grazing in an arid ecosystem?

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 378, Issue 1-2, Pages 35-48

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-013-2010-8

Keywords

Arid ecosystems; Grazing; Plant litter; Soil enzymes; Microbial biomass

Funding

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT 08-11131, 08-20454, 02-02192- PICT 1349]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas of Argentina [PIP-112-200801-01664]
  3. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas, Argentina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our objective was to assess the effects of long-term continuous grazing on soil enzyme activities in relation to shifts in plant litter attributes and soil resources in an arid ecosystem, considering both spatial and temporal variations. We randomly extracted soil samples with the respective litter cover at 5 modal size plant-covered patches (PCP) and the nearest inter-canopy areas (IC) at Patagonian Monte sites with low, medium and high grazing intensity in winter and summer from 2007 to 2009. We analyzed enzyme activities (dehydrogenase, -glucosidase, protease, alkaline and acid phosphatase), microbial biomass-C, organic-C, total soil-N, and moisture in soil and mass and quality in plant litter. We assessed faeces density and plant cover in the field. Grazing led to reduced grass cover, decreasing plant litter mass with increasing soluble phenolics, and reduced phosphatases, -glucosidase and microbial biomass-C at PCP. A localized nutrient input from animal excreta seems to promote microbial biomass-C, alkaline phosphatase and dehydrogenase activities but only at IC from the site with high grazing intensity. Plant heterogeneous distribution, plant litter quantity and quality, nutrient inputs from grazers and seasonal variation in soil moisture, also affecting soil resources and microbial biomass, modulate soil enzyme responses to long-term grazing in the arid Patagonian Monte.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available