4.7 Article

Involvement of putrescine and nitric oxide in aluminum tolerance by modulating citrate secretion from roots of red kidney bean

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 366, Issue 1-2, Pages 479-490

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-012-1447-5

Keywords

Aluminum tolerance; Nitric oxide; Organic acids; Polyamines; Red kidney bean

Funding

  1. Doctor Initiative Foundation of Henan Normal University [11129]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [31171182]
  3. Innovation Scientists and Technicians Troop Construction Projects of Henan Province [104100510012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polyamines and nitric oxide (NO) are two important molecules modulating numerous environment stresses in plants. This study was to investigate the roles of polyamines and NO in aluminum (Al) tolerance in red kidney bean. The interaction between putrescine (Put) and NO under Al stress was examined. NO donor and scavenger were used to further examine the role of NO in Al-induced citrate secretion from roots by high performance liquid chromatography. Al stress caused increase of endogenous free Put, and exogenous Put alleviated Al-induced inhibition of root elongation and Al accumulation. In addition, Put induced NO production and nitrate reductase (NR) activity under Al stress. Al- and Put-induced NO production could be reversed by NR inhibitor. Furthermore, Al stress stimulated citrate secretion from roots, and this response was stimulated by NO donor, whereas NO scavenger inhibited Al-induced citrate secretion from roots. Concomitantly, NO donor reduced Al accumulation in root apexes, while NO scavenger further enhanced Al accumulation. Al-induced inhibition of root growth was significantly improved by exogenous citrate treatment. Put and NO enhanced Al tolerance by modulating citrate secretion from roots, and NO may act downstream of Put in red kidney bean under Al stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available