Journal
PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 353, Issue 1-2, Pages 95-106Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-011-1012-7
Keywords
Biochar; Herbicide; Sorption; Bioassay; Foxtail; Metolachlor; Sulfentrazone; Efficacy; Phytoavailability; Weed protection; Isotherm; Non-linear; Adsorption
Categories
Funding
- Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development [301-0693-10]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background and Aims Amendment of soil by biochar may reduce efficacy of soil-applied herbicides due to sorption. Methods Bioassays with Green Foxtail (Setaria viridis) tested the influence of two biochars on phytoavailability of S-metolachlor and sulfentrazone under biochar amendment of 0, 13, 26 and 52 Mg ha(-1). Results Adsorption of both herbicides was an order of magnitude greater on a high specific surface area (SSA) biochar (EUC-800; SSA 242 m(2) g(-1)) than on a low SSA biochar (BC-1; SSA 3.6 m(2) g(-1)). Herbicide doses near the lowest recommended label rates controlled the weed at 13 and 26 Mg ha(-1) of BC-1; sulfentrazone was also effective at 52 Mg BC-1 ha(-1). These same herbicide doses controlled weed germination and development only at 13 Mg ha(-1) of EUC800; at herbicide doses near the highest label rates, weed control was also achieved at 26 Mg EUC800 ha(-1), but not at 52 Mg EUC-800 ha(-1). Conclusions Increased doses of soil-applied herbicides cannot necessarily offset decreases in herbicide phytoavailability in biochar-amended soils, particularly if the biochar has a high SSA. Considering the long half-life of biochar in soil, pest control needs will be best served by low SSA biochars.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available