4.7 Article

Integrated soil and plant phosphorus management for crop and environment in China. A review

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 349, Issue 1-2, Pages 157-167

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-011-0909-5

Keywords

Building-up and maintenance; Environmental risk; Nutrient management; Phosphorus accumulation and flow; Phosphorus use efficiency; Rhizosphere management

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30890130, 30925024]
  2. NSFC [30821003]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB118606]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crop production in China has been greatly improved by increasing phosphorus (P) fertilizer input, but overuse of P by farmers has caused low use efficiency, increasing environmental risk and accumulation of P in soil. From 1980 to 2007, average 242 kg P ha-1 accumulated in soil, resulting in average soil Olsen P increasing from 7.4 to 24.7 mg kg-1. China is facing huge challenges to improve P use efficiency through optimizing corresponding technology and policies. The problem is exacerbated because people have been shifting their diet from plant-based to animal-enriched foods. This results in higher P load in the food chain and lower P use efficiency. A multidisciplinary approach has been used to improve P management at the field and national level in China. Management strategies based on the soil and on the plant rhizosphere have been developed to increase efficient use of P. A national soil testing and fertilizer recommendation program has been used since 2005 to control build-up and maintenance of P levels. Interactions between root growth and the rhizosphere have been manipulated in intercropping systems and plant genetic traits have been exploited. Phosphorus surplus is highly associated with animal concentrated feed. The P-saving potential by the integrated P management strategies of P flow reaches 1.46 Mt P in 2050 compared to 2005.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available