4.7 Article

The relationship between the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and grazing in a meadow steppe

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 352, Issue 1-2, Pages 143-156

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-011-0985-6

Keywords

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; Diversity; Grazing; Plant community character; Soil property; Richness

Funding

  1. State Key Basic Research Program [2007CB106801]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30900184, 31070294, 31072070]
  3. Ministry of Education of China [20090043120010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims To study the relationship between changes in soil properties and plant community characters produced by grazing in a meadow steppe grassland and the composition and diversity of spore-producing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Methods A field survey was carried out in a meadow steppe area with a gradient of grazing pressures (a site with four grazing intensities and a reserve closed to grazing). The AMF community composition (characterized by spore abundance) and diversity, the vegetation characters and soil properties were measured, and root colonization by AMF was assessed. Results AMF diversity (richness and evenness) was higher under light to moderate grazing pressure and declined under intense grazing pressures. Results of multiple regressions indicated that soil electrical conductivity was highly associated with AMF diversity. The variation in AMF diversity was partially associated to the density of tillers of the dominant grass (Leymus chinensis), the above and below-ground biomass and the richness of the plant community. Conclusions We propose that the relationship between plants and AMF is altered by environmental stress (salinity) which is in turn influenced by animal grazing. Direct and indirect interactions between vegetation, soil properties, and AMF community need to be elucidated to improve our ability to manage these communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available