4.7 Article

Temporal dynamics of exchangeable K, Ca and Mg in acidic bulk soil and rhizosphere under Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 349, Issue 1-2, Pages 355-366

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-011-0881-0

Keywords

Soil nutrients; Temporal variations; Rhizosphere; Bulk soil; Exchangeable base cations; Norway spruce; Beech; Sustainable forest ecosystem

Funding

  1. Lorraine Region
  2. ONF (Office National des Forets)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims The aim of this study was to assess the seasonal influence on the dynamics of exchangeable nutrients (K, Ca and Mg) in acidic and nutrient-poor forest soils, where nutrients can become limiting for tree growth. Methods The amounts of exchangeable base cations (K++Ca2++Mg2+) were measured in soil samples collected in three soil compartments (Bulk, Outer Rhizosphere, and Inner Rhizosphere) and in 4 months (November, February, May and August) under two stands of 31-year-old Norway spruce and beech in an acidic temperate forest. Results In all season, both rhizosphere compartments were enriched in exchangeable nutrients compared to bulk soil. This suggests that tree roots and root-associated microorganisms (bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi) increased nutrient availability through mineral weathering or mineralization processes, and thus could contribute to forest sustainability in nutrient-poor conditions. Interestingly, in contrast to beech, a drastic decrease of exchangeable base cations was observed in bulk soil of spruce between November and February (higher than 80% for K and Mg, and 100% for Ca). The relation between this decrease, Al solubility, and nitrate concentration are evoked in the discussion. Conclusion This study reveals that processes resulting from interactions between trees, microorganisms and soil influence not only the seasonal dynamics of nutrients in the root vicinity but also the bulk soil function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available