4.7 Article

Quantifying uptake rate of potassium from soil in a long-term grass rotation experiment

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 335, Issue 1-2, Pages 3-19

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-010-0429-8

Keywords

Depletion; Perennial ryegrass; Potassium; Release; Soil minerals; Weathering

Funding

  1. Scottish Government Rural, Environment and Research Analysis Department (RERAD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil-plant potassium (K) dynamics were studied using a long-term field experiment in order to evaluate the plant performance and K delivering capacity of the soil parent material. Rye grass (Lolium perenne L.) based rotations on a loamy sand derived from granitic bedrock were studied over 30 years with two K-fertilisation regimes, nil (K0) and 65 kg K ha(-1) yr(-1). Mineralogical and chemical methods were combined to identify and quantify soil K resources including the partitioning of K between minerals. Two or three cuts were taken annually and herbage yield and composition together with exchangeable soil K were analysed. Herbage yield declined with time and significantly reduced when the K concentrations approached 1%. The grass K concentration also declined over time and stabilized at around 0.5-0.7% (dw) in K0 in all cuts. Input-output mass balances showed an accumulated net K off-take (deficit) of 1,100 kg ha(-1), i.e. 35 kg ha(-1) yr(-1). With an exchangeable K pool of 100 kg ha(-1) (in the rooting zone 0-40 cm) this indicated a substantial release of K from mineral sources, most probably biotite and hydrobiotite. Assuming a similar net off-take was continued then this particular mineralogical K source would be depleted within two centuries. The study illustrates the strength of combining long-term field experimental data with state of the art quantitative mineralogical methods in order to assess site-specific resources which can form a basis to evaluate the sustainability of different management practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available