4.7 Review

Desirable plant root traits for protecting natural and engineered slopes against landslides

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 324, Issue 1-2, Pages 1-30

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-009-0159-y

Keywords

Soil cohesion; Root architecture; Slope stability; Soil mass wasting; Suction

Funding

  1. INRA (Jeune Equipe)
  2. CNRS
  3. Agropolis Fondation, Montpellier
  4. Scottish Government Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Slope stability models traditionally use simple indicators of root system structure and strength when vegetation is included as a factor. However, additional root system traits should be considered when managing vegetated slopes to avoid shallow substrate mass movement. Traits including root distribution, length, orientation and diameter are recognized as influencing soil fixation, but do not consider the spatial and temporal dimensions of roots within a system. Thick roots act like soil nails on slopes and the spatial position of these thick roots determines the arrangement of the associated thin roots. Thin roots act in tension during failure on slopes and if they traverse the potential shear zone, provide a major contribution in protecting against landslides. We discuss how root traits change depending on ontogeny and climate, how traits are affected by the local soil environment and the types of plastic responses expressed by the plant. How a landslide engineer can use this information when considering slope stability and management strategies is discussed, along with perspectives for future research. This review encompasses many ideas, data and concepts presented at the Second International Conference 'Ground Bio- and Eco-engineering: The Use of Vegetation to Improve Slope Stability-ICGBE2' held at Beijing, China, 14-18 July 2008. Several papers from this conference are published in this edition of Plant and Soil.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available