4.7 Article

Emergent macrophytes in phosphorus limited marshes: do phosphorus usage strategies change after nutrient addition?

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 313, Issue 1-2, Pages 141-153

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-008-9687-0

Keywords

Eleocharis cellulosa; Nitrogen; Phosphorus; Resorption efficiency; Root phosphatase; Typha domingensis

Funding

  1. NSF [0089211]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology [0089211] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two strategies for phosphorus (P) economy in P-limiting environment are conservation of use and enhanced acquisition. Using two wetland macrophytes as an example, we show how these strategies change when the P-limitation is removed. Phosphorus resorption and activities of root phosphatases were evaluated over 4 years in Eleocharis cellulosa Torr. and Typha domingensis Pers. from nutrient addition experiment (P, N, N&P, control) established in 15 P limited marshes of Belize. We hypothesized that after P addition both species will increase tissue P content and decrease P resorption efficiency and root phosphatase activity. Initially high phosphorus resorption efficiency, PRE, significantly decreased in Eleocharis 2 years after the first nutrient addition, while no significant decrease was recorded for Typha. Even more dramatic was 5- to 6-fold increase in P in senescent tissues of Eleocharis as compared to less than 2-fold increase in Typha. Root phosphatase activity was high for both species from control plots. After P addition, Eleocharis showed 35% to 70% decrease in enzyme activity correlated to availability of inorganic P in sediments. Eleocharis and Typha employ the conservation of use strategy when growing in P limited oligotrophic marshes. In addition, Eleocharis is also using the enhanced acquisition strategy. These strategies change when the P limitation is removed but the response varies between the two species and thus changes in the proportion of these two species in a community may result in differences in ecosystem processes such as decomposition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available