4.7 Article

A Rapid, Direct Observation Method to Isolate Mutants with Defects in Starch Grain Morphology in Rice

Journal

PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages 728-741

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcq040

Keywords

Amylopectin; Endosperm; Oryza sativa; Rice; Starch grain; Thin section

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [20770036]
  2. Iijima Memorial Foundation for the Promotion of Food Science and Technology
  3. Science and Technology Foundation of Japan
  4. Oohara Foundation
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20770036] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Starch forms transparent grains, referred to as starch grains (SGs), in amyloplasts. Despite the simple glucose polymer composition of starch, SGs exhibit different morphologies depending on plant species, especially in the endosperm of the Poaceae family. This study reports a novel method for preparing thin sections of endosperm without chemical fixation or resin embedding that allowed us to visualize subcellular SGs clearly. Using this method, we observed the SG morphologies of 5,000 mutagenized rice seeds and were able to isolate mutants in which SGs were morphologically altered. In five mutants, named ssg (substandard starch grain), increased numbers of small SGs (ssg1ssg3), enlarged SGs (ssg4) and abnormal interior structures of SGs (ssg5) were observed. Amylopectin chain length distribution analysis and identification of the mutated gene suggested a possible allelic relationship between ssg1, ssg2, ssg3 and the previously isolated amylose-extender (ae) mutants, while ssg4 and ssg5 seemed to be novel mutants. Compared with conventional observation methods, the methods developed here are more effective for obtaining fine images of subcellular SGs and are suitable for the observation of a large number of samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available