4.7 Article

Various Spatiotemporal Expression Profiles of Anther-Expressed Genes in Rice

Journal

PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 10, Pages 1417-1428

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcn128

Keywords

Anther; Gene ontology; Laser microdissection; Microarray; Oryza sativa L.; Synchronous gene expression

Funding

  1. The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (MEXT) [18075003, 18075012, 18075005, 18075006, 18075009, 19043009, 19043015, 19651084]
  2. Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  3. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan
  4. Integrated Research Project for Plant, Insect, and Animal [IPG-0003, IPG-0012, IPG-0019]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18075005, 19043015, 18075006, 18075003, 18075012, 18075009, 19651084, 19043009] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The male gametophyte and tapetum play different roles during anther development although they are differentiated from the same cell lineage, the L2 layer. Until now, it has not been possible to delineate their transcriptomes due to technical difficulties in separating the two cell types. In the present study, we characterized the separated transcriptomes of the rice microspore/pollen and tapetum using laser microdissection (LM)-mediated microarray. Spatiotemporal expression patterns of 28,141 anther-expressed genes were classified into 20 clusters, which contained 3,468 (12.3%) anther-enriched genes. In some clusters, synchronous gene expression in the microspore and tapetum at the same developmental stage was observed as a novel characteristic of the anther transcriptome. Noteworthy expression patterns are discussed in connection with gene ontology (GO) categories and gene annotations, which are related to important biological events in anther development, such as pollen maturation, pollen germination, pollen tube elongation and pollen wall formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available