4.3 Article

On the amount of heavy molecular ions in Titan's ionosphere

Journal

PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE
Volume 57, Issue 14-15, Pages 1857-1865

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2009.07.014

Keywords

Titan's ionosphere; Cassini; Heavy molecular ions; Titan aeronomy; Aerosol formation; Ionospheric physics

Funding

  1. Swedish National Space Board (SNSB)
  2. EU/EUROPLANET
  3. International Space Science Institute (ISSI)
  4. STFC [PP/E001173/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E001173/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. UK Space Agency [PP/D00084X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present observational evidence that the ionosphere of Titan below an altitude of 1150 km is a significant source of heavy (> 100 amu) molecular organic species. This study is based on measurements by five instruments (RPWS/LP, RPWS/E, INMS, CAPS/ELS, CAPS/IBS) onboard the Cassini spacecraft during three flybys (T17, T18, T32) of Titan. The ionospheric peaks encountered at altitudes of 950-1300 km had densities in the range 900-3000 cm(-3). Below these peaks the number densities of heavy positively charged ions reached 100-2000 cm(-3) and approached 50-70% of the total ionospheric density with an increasing trend toward lowest measured altitudes. Simultaneously measured negatively charged ion densities were in the range 50-150 cm(-3). These results imply that similar to 10(5)similar to 10(6) heavy positively charged ions/m(3)/s are continuously recombining into heavy neutrals and supply the atmosphere of Titan. The ionosphere may in this way produce 0.1-1 Mt/yr of heavy organic compounds and is therefore a sizable source for aerosol formation. We also predict that Titan's ionosphere is dominated by heavy (> 100 amu) molecular ions below 950 km. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available