4.3 Article

Greenhouse Gas Emission and Balance of Marshes at the Southern North Sea Coast

Journal

WETLANDS
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 121-132

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13157-015-0722-7

Keywords

Methane; Nitrous oxide; Greenhouse gas balance; Marshes; Sulphate; Coastal wetlands

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the joint research project COMTESS (COastal sustainable land Management Trade-offs in EcoSystem Services)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Environmental parameters controlling fluxes of greenhouse gases (GHG) differ spatially within landscapes. This study aimed to improve the understanding of landscape processes controlling GHG-fluxes of different landscape units of marshes (in terms of vegetation, land use and seawater inflow) at the Southern North Sea coast. For this emissions of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) were quantified and related to reported carbon sequestration rates. Ancillary environmental parameters were determined to identify controlling factors and thresholds enabling GHG emissions. For inland marshes (enclosed by embankments) the water level was the predominant factor controlling CH4 emissions ranging between 1.58 and 1544.70 kg CH4 ha(-1) a(-1). The duration of threshold (10 cm below surface) exceedance was found as a predictor for annual CH4 emissions. Emissions of outland marshes (influenced by tides) varying from -1.34 to 55.14 kg CH4 ha(-1) a(-1) were predominantly controlled by sulphate (SO42-) concentrations, because soil CH4-contents were negligible when soil SO42--contents exceeded 0.5 mg g(-1). The variability of the N2O-fluxes (-0.81 to 17.78 kgN(2)O ha(-1) a(-1)) could not be explained by the collected environmental parameters. GHG balances indicated that inland extensive grasslands and particularly reed stands are net sources of CO2-equivalents (100 year time horizon), while outlands are natural sinks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available