4.5 Article

New insights into uteroplacental perfusion: Quantitative analysis using Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging

Journal

PLACENTA
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 424-431

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.01.019

Keywords

Uteroplacental perfusion; Doppler ultrasound; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Placenta; Rat

Funding

  1. AREFO association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To monitor and quantify uteroplacental perfusion in rat pregnancies by Doppler ultrasound (DUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Methods: Fourteen rats were randomized in two groups (the CEUS group and the control group). On days 8, 11, 14, 17, 19 and 20 of gestation, we used DUS to measure the resistance index (RI), pulsatility index and blood velocity in the uterine, arcuate and umbilical arteries in both groups. On days 14, 17 and 20, one group was also examined by CEUS. Quantitative perfusion parameters were calculated in 4 compartments (mesometrial triangle, placenta, umbilical cord and fetus) and compared. Results: The DUS measurement showed that the RI of the uterine and arcuate arteries decreased (p < 0.01) from day 14 to day 17, while velocity increased each of these arteries (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). Quantification of uteroplacental perfusion by CEUS in bolus mode revealed that blood volume and local blood flow increased from day 14 to day 20 in the mesometrial triangle (p < 0.01) and the placenta (p < 0.05). In the CEUS destruction-replenishment mode, the perfusion parameters showed trends similar to those observed in bolus mode. No microbubbles were detected in the umbilical vein or fetal compartments. The weights of pups in the two groups did not differ significantly. Conclusions: CEUS estimates of placental perfusion complement the data provided by DUS. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available