4.3 Article

Diversity Pattern of Macrobenthos Associated with Different Stages of Wetland Restoration in the Yellow River Delta

Journal

WETLANDS
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages S57-S67

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13157-015-0641-7

Keywords

Coastal wetlands; Restoration; Management; Macrobenthos; Estuary

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2013CB430406]
  2. China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [51125035]
  3. National Science Foundation for Innovative Research Group [51121003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because wetland restoration projects are becoming more common and are expensive, it is important to evaluate their success. Evaluation studies common use measurements of soils, vegetation, hydrology and wildlife to evaluate the success of wetland restoration. In contrast, the diversity of macrobenthos and their relationships with environmental factors are often neglected. To better understand the success of wetland restoration, we examined the abundance and diversity of macrobenthos in different stages of a freshwater wetland restoration project in the Yellow River Delta in China, with reference to environmental factors that might explain macrobenthic patterns. Macrobenthic species richness and density were greater in the oldest restoration area versus the younger and no-treatment areas. Macrobenthic biomass, however, was greatest in the no-treatment area. The oldest restoration area had deeper water levels, lower salinities, softer and wetter soils, and higher soil organic, nitrogen and carbon contents, and these variables largely distinguished the macrobenthic samples in a CCA analysis. A combination of landscape position and recovery time (time since the restoration was implemented) likely explains the abiotic differences among restoration areas. We recommend an adaptive management strategy, guided by long-term monitoring and experiments, to improve the success of this and other wetland restoration projects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available