4.2 Article

Prolactin levels in manganese-exposed male welders

Journal

PITUITARY
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 564-568

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11102-013-0545-6

Keywords

Prolactin; Manganese toxicity; Biomarker; Exposure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Early studies on manganese (Mn) exposure have demonstrated that this transition metal affects dopamine neurotransmission. Dopamine serves as a tonic inhibitor of prolactin release in the anterior hypophysis. Our aim was to determine the relation between serum prolactin levels and manganese-exposure. Methods Whole blood was collected from 95 nonexposed control subjects and 179 manganese-exposed male welders. Whole blood manganese was analyzed by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometer on Agilent 7700 (Agilent Technologies, USA). Serum prolactin levels (PRL), aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), urea, creatinine, soduim (Na), potassium (K) were analyzed by immunological and spectrophotometric methods on Roche E170 Modular System (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Results The mean ages for control and manganeseexposed group were 40.5 +/- 7.8 and 39.5 +/- 8.7, respectively (p = 0.258). The mean working period (years) for control and manganese-exposed group were 17.4 +/- 9.8 and 18.2 +/- 7.7 years, respectively (p = 0.581). Serum AST and potassium levels were significantly higher in control group than manganese-exposed group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.048, respectively) and body-mass index (BMI) was significantly lower in control group than manganeseexposed group (p = 0.033). There was a significantly positive correlation between whole blood manganese levels and serum prolactin (r = 0.860, p < 0.001). Serum ALT levels were positively correlated with serum AST, urea and sodium (r = 0.315, p < 0.001; r = 0.121, p = 0.046; r = 0.130, p = 0.031). Conclusions Serum prolactin level is a diagnostic marker for determining the effect of manganese-exposure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available