4.2 Article

Efficacy of long-term lanreotide treatment in patients with acromegaly

Journal

PITUITARY
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 285-293

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11102-009-0172-4

Keywords

Acromegaly; Lanreotide; Octreotide; Pituitary adenoma; Somatostatin

Funding

  1. Medison Pharma, Israel

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the effectiveness of lanreotide for the treatment of active acromegaly in a retrospectively multicenter case series including 53 patients (24 male, 29 female; mean age at diagnosis, 49.5 +/- A 13.9 years) with acromegaly treated with lanreotide in nine different centers. Mean tumor diameter was 20 +/- A 13 mm; mean basal levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) were 21.3 +/- A 26.3 and 579 +/- A 177 mu g/l, respectively. The primary mode of treatment was surgery in 70% of patients. Twenty-nine patients received only lanreotide (Prolonged Release, Autogel), whereas 24 subjects were also treated with octreotide at another treatment stage. Primary therapy with lanreotide was administered in five patients. Maximal monthly dose of lanreotide Autogel (n = 44) was 60 mg in 45%, 90 mg in 26%, 120 mg in 21% and 180 mg in 8%. During 36 months of lanreotide treatment, mean IGF-I levels decreased from 443 +/- A 238 to 276 +/- A 147 mu g/l (P < 0.001), and mean GH levels, from 5.2 +/- A 6.4 to 3.2 +/- A 3.0 mu g/l (P < 0.001). IGF-I levels normalized in 51% of patients and decreased by > 50% towards normal in 32%; the normalization rate was higher in women (65%) than men (33%, P = 0.04). Safe random GH levels (a parts per thousand currency sign2 mu g/l) were achieved in 49% of patients. Both IGF-I normalization and safe GH levels were reached in 32% of the cohort. Lanreotide is an effective treatment for active acromegaly. Female sex was associated with higher rates of IGF-I normalization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available