4.7 Article

Preliminary Safety Evaluation and Biochemical Efficacy of a Carum carvi Extract: Results from a Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Journal

PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 10, Pages 1456-1460

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.5147

Keywords

Carum carvi; caraway aqueous extract; volatile compounds; safety; obesity; phytotherapy

Funding

  1. Cluster of Sustainability and Science, Department of Science and Technology Studies, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia [RP026-2012F]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carum carvi L. (Apiaceae) is known as caraway, and its derivatives find wide medicinal use for health purposes, including for gastrointestinal problems and obesity. Since there is inconsistency among the reports on the safety of this plant in humans, this research was aimed at assessing the safety of a characterized caraway aqueous extract (CAE) in a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled study. Seventy, overweight and obese, healthy women were randomly assigned into placebo (n=35) and plant extract (n=35) groups. Participants received either 30ml/day of CAE or placebo. Subjects were examined at baseline and after 12weeks for changes in heart rate, blood pressure, urine test, 25-item blood chemistries, and general health status. No significant changes of blood pressure, heart rate, urine specific gravity, and serum blood tests were observed between the two groups before and after treatment. However, in the complete blood count test, red blood cell levels were significantly (p<0.01) increased, and platelet distribution width was significantly decreased after the dietary CAE treatment, as compared with placebo. No negative changes were observed in the general health status of the two groups. This preliminary study suggests that the oral intake of CAE appears to be without any adverse effects at a dosage of 30ml daily for a period of 12weeks. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available