4.3 Article

Malyngamide 4, a new lipopeptide from the Red Sea marine cyanobacterium Moorea producens (formerly Lyngbya majuscula)

Journal

PHYTOCHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 183-188

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytol.2013.01.002

Keywords

Red Sea cyanobacterium; Moorea producens; Malyngamides 4, A and B and lyngbic acid; Aplysiatoxin and debromoaplysiatoxin; In vitro tumor growth inhibition; In vitro inhibition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Funding

  1. King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah [322/166/1432]
  2. DSR
  3. U.S. Tuberculosis Antimicrobial Acquisition and Coordinating Facility (TAACF), NIAID/NIH [1540]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In our continuing effort to discover new drug leads from Red Sea marine organisms, a sample of the marine cyanobacterium Moorea producens (previously Lyngbya majuscula) was investigated. Bioassay-directed purification of a tumor cell-growth inhibitory fraction of the organic extract of the Red Sea cyanobacterium afforded a new compound, malyngamide 4 (1), together with five previously reported compounds, malyngamide A (2) and B (3), (S)-7-methoxytetradec-4(E)-enoic acid (lyngbic acid, 4), aplysiatoxin (5) and debromoaplysiatoxin (6). Assignment of the planar structures of these compounds was based on extensive analysis of one- and two-dimensional NMR spectra and high-resolution mass spectrometric data. The isolated compounds were evaluated for their inhibitory activity against three cancer cell lines. In addition, the antibacterial activity of the compounds against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H(37)Rv ATCC 27294 (H(37)Rv) was evaluated. Lyngbic acid (4) was the most active against M. tuberculosis, while malyngamides 4 (1) and B (3) moderately inhibited the cancer cell lines. The other compounds were deemed inactive at the test concentrations. (C) 2013 Phytochemical Society of Europe. Published by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available