4.7 Article

Hydroperoxide lyase cascade in pea seedlings: Non-volatile oxylipins and their age and stress dependent alterations

Journal

PHYTOCHEMISTRY
Volume 72, Issue 4-5, Pages 356-364

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.01.013

Keywords

Lipoxygenase pathway; Hydroperoxide lyase; Oxylipins profiles; Stress response; Pea (Pisum sativum L)

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [09-04-01023-a]
  2. Russian Academy of Sciences
  3. Leading Scientific Schools

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The profiles of non-volatile oxylipins of pea (Pisum sativum) seedlings were examined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry after in vitro incubation with alpha-linolenic acid. The 13-lipoxygenase/hydroperoxide lyase (HPL) products were predominant in the leaves, while the roots possess both 13-and 9-HPL products. Allene oxide synthase (AOS) and divinyl ether synthase (DES) products were not detected in the leaves or in the roots of any age. The HPL cascade produces a diversity of oxylipins, including the compounds (2E)-4-hydroxy-traumatic, (10E)-9,12-dihydroxy-10-dodecenoic and 9,12-dihydroxydodecanoic acids, as well as (2E)-4-hydroxy-2-nonenoic acid, which has not yet been detected in plants. Oxylipin patterns were altered by infection, water deficit, as well as by plant age. Infection caused the specific strong accumulation of azelaic (nonane-1,9-dioic) acid in the leaves. The azelaic acid content in the aged (14 and 18 day-old) leaves was significantly higher than in the younger leaves. Water deficit induced the accumulation of (2E)-4-hydroxy-2-nonenoic acid and (2E)-traumatic acid in the roots. Results demonstrate that: (1) the HPL cascade is the predominant branch of the lipoxygenase pathway in pea seedlings; (2) the HPL products may have the regulatory role both in growth control and adaptation. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available