4.7 Article

Structure-function characterization of the recombinant aspartic proteinase A1 from Arabidopsis thaliana

Journal

PHYTOCHEMISTRY
Volume 71, Issue 5-6, Pages 515-523

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.12.005

Keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana; Cruciferae; Plant aspartic proteinase; Substrate specificity; Thermal stability; pH stability; Plant specific insert; Proteases

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT) of Mexico

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aspartic proteinases (APs) are involved in several physiological processes in plants, including protein processing, senescence, and stress response and share many structural and functional features with mammalian and microbial APs. The heterodimeric aspartic proteinase A1 from Arabidopsis thaliana (AtAP A1) was the first acid protease identified in this model plant, however, little information exists regarding its structure function characteristics. Circular dichroism analysis indicated that recombinant AtAP A1 contained an higher a-helical content than most APs which was attributed to the presence of a sequence known as the plant specific insert in the mature enzyme. rAtAP A1 was stable over a broad pH range (pH 3-8) with the highest stability at pH 5-6, where 70-80% of the activity was retained after 1 month at 37 degrees C. Using calorimetry, a melting point of 79.6 degrees C was observed at pH 5.3. Cleavage profiles of insulin beta-chain indicated that the enzyme exhibited a higher specificity as compared to other plant APs, with a high preference for the Leu(15)-Tyr(16) peptide bond. Molecular modeling of AtAP A1 indicated that exposed histidine residues and their interaction with nearby charged groups may explain the pH stability of rAtAP A1. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available