4.7 Article

Investigation of fretting wear behavior of Inconel 690 alloy in tube/plate contact configuration

Journal

WEAR
Volume 328, Issue -, Pages 582-590

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2015.04.003

Keywords

Fretting; Inconel alloy; Debris cleaning; Elevated temperature; Wear mechanism

Funding

  1. National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project [51025519]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51375407]
  3. Yangtze River Scholars and Innovation Team Development Plan [IRT1178]
  4. Shanghai Science and Technology Talent Program [14R21421500]
  5. Large-scale Advanced PWR Major Projects [2010Zx06004-18]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fretting wear tests of Inconel 690 alloy have been carried out at various temperatures (room temperature -RT, 90 degrees C, 200 degrees C and 285 degrees C) for tube/plate contact configuration. The worn surfaces and cross-sectional morphologies were observed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) and electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). Moreover, a particular debris cleaning method was used to remove wear particles of worn Inconel 690 alloy effectively in order to estimate exact wear volume. Overall, the results indicated that temperature had a great impact on fretting wear behavior and wear mechanisms. With increase in temperature, the principal wear mechanisms changed from delamination wear to the combination of delamination and adhesive wear, as demonstrated by the presence of an adhesive transfer layer at 285 degrees C, instead of a compacted debris bed at 90 degrees C. The adhesive transfer layer seemed to protect the surfaces better due to a reduction in the interaction of the worn surfaces. Finally, higher friction coefficient and wear volume appeared at lower temperature (RT to 90 degrees C), compared to that associated with higher temperature (200 degrees C and 285 degrees C). 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available