4.5 Article

Influence of thermophysiology on thermal behavior: the essentials of categorization

Journal

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages 180-187

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.01.025

Keywords

Thermoregulatory behavior; Thermophysiology; Categorization; Thermal sensation; Thermal preference

Funding

  1. AgentschapNL [EOS-LT 10033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Predicted energy use of dwellings often deviates from the actual energy use. Thermoregulatory behavior of the occupant might explain this difference. Such behavior is influenced by thermal sensation and thermal comfort. These subjective ratings in turn are linked to physiological parameters such as core and skin temperatures. However, it is unclear which physiological parameters best predict thermoregulatory behavior. The objective of this research was to study physiological parameters that potentially can be used to predict thermoregulatory behavior. Sixteen healthy females (18-30 years) were exposed to two dynamic temperature protocols: a gradual increase (+4 K/h, ranging from 24 degrees C to 32 degrees C) and a gradual decrease in ambient temperature (4 K/h, ranging from 24 degrees C to 16 degrees C). During the experiments physiological responses, thermal sensation, thermal preference and the intention of thermoregulatory behavior were measured. Thermal sensation is highly correlated with thermal preference (r = 0.933, P < 0.001). The skin temperature of the wrist best predicts thermal sensation (R-2 = 0.558, P < 0.001) and therefore seems useful as a physiological parameter to predict the intention of thermoregulatory behavior. When the subjects are categorized based on their thermal sensation votes, more precise predictions of thermal sensation can be made. This categorization therefore can be of value for the determination of the actual energy use of occupant in dwellings.. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available