4.5 Article

Efficacy of fasting calorie restriction on quality of life among aging men

Journal

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages 1059-1064

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.07.007

Keywords

Aging; Calorie restriction; Men; Nutrition; Quality of life

Funding

  1. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia [UKM-AP-TKP-09-2009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Calorie restriction (CR) has been promoted to increase longevity. Previous studies have indicated that CR can negatively affect mood and therefore the effect of CR on mood and quality of life (QOL) becomes crucial when considering the feasibility of CR in humans. We conducted a three month clinical trial on CR (reduction of 300 to 500 kcal/day) combined with two days/week of Muslim sunnah fasting (FCR) to determine the effectiveness of FCR on QOL among aging men in Kiang Valley, Malaysia. A total of 25 healthy Malay men (age 58.8 +/- 5.1 years), with no chronic diseases and a BMI of 23.0 to 29.9 kg/m(2) were randomized to FCR (n = 12) and control (n = 13) groups. Body composition measurements and QOL questionnaires were ascertained at baseline, week 6 and week 12. QOL was measured using the Short-Form 36, sleep quality was determined using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Beck Depression Inventory II was used to measure mood and the Perceived Stress Scale was used to measure depression. The FCR group had a significant reduction in body weight, BMI, body fat percentage and depression (P < 0.05). The energy component of QOL was significantly increased in FCR group (p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in sleep quality and stress level between the groups as a result of the intervention. In conclusion, FCR resulted in body weight and fat loss and alleviated depression with some improvement in the QOL in our study and has the potential to be implemented on a wider scale. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available