4.5 Review

Sex differences in learning processes of classical and operant conditioning

Journal

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 97, Issue 2, Pages 229-238

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.02.035

Keywords

Learning; Conditioning; Association; Conditioned responses; Female rats; Sex differences; Eyeblink conditioning; Fear conditioning; Conditioned taste aversion; Active avoidance; Fear-potentiated startle; Estrogen; Operant conditioning; Testosterone; Organizational effects of hormones; Ovariectomy; Castration; Spines; Hippocampus; Neurogenesis

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IOB-0444364]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH)-National Institutes of Mental Health [MH59970]
  3. 6th European Community Framework Programme
  4. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0914386] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Males and females learn and remember differently at different times in their lives. These differences occur in most species, from invertebrates to humans. We review here sex differences as they occur in laboratory rodent species. We focus on classical and operant conditioning paradigms, including classical eyeblink conditioning, fear-conditioning, active avoidance and conditioned taste aversion. Sex differences have been reported during acquisition, retention and extinction in most of these paradigms. In general, females perform better than males in the classical eyeblink conditioning, in fear-potentiated startle and in most operant conditioning tasks, such as the active avoidance test. However, in the classical fear-conditioning paradigm, in certain lever-pressing paradigms and in the conditioned taste aversion, males outperform females or are more resistant to extinction. Most sex differences in conditioning are dependent on organizational effects of gonadal hormones during early development of the brain, in addition to modulation by activational effects during puberty and adulthood. Critically, sex differences in performance account for some of the reported effects on learning and these are discussed throughout the review. Because so many mental disorders are more prevalent in one sex than the other, it is important to consider sex differences in learning when applying animal models of learning for these disorders. Finally, we discuss how sex differences in learning continue to alter the brain throughout the lifespan. Thus, sex differences in learning are not only mediated by sex differences in the brain, but also contribute to them. (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available