4.5 Article

Keep cool: Memory is retained during hibernation in Alpine marmots

Journal

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 98, Issue 1-2, Pages 78-84

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.04.013

Keywords

Marmota; Behavior; Learning, Operant conditioning; Positive reinforcement; Open held test; Familiarity detection; Locomotor activity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hibernators display severe changes in brain structure during deep torpor, including alterations in synaptic constitution. To address a possible effect on long-term memory, we examined learning behavior and memory of the hibernator Marmota marmota. In two operant conditioning tasks, the marmots learned to jump on two boxes or to walk through a tube. The animals were trained during their active season. Performance improved during the training phase and remained stable in a last test, four weeks before entrance into hibernation. When retested after six months of hibernation, skills were found to be unimpaired (box: before hibernation: 258.2 +/- 17.7 s, after hibernation: 275.0 +/- 19.8 s: tube: before hibernation: 158.4 +/- 9.0 s, after hibernation: 137.7 +/- 6.3 s). Contrary to these findings, memory seemed to be less fixed during the active season, since changes in test procedure resulted in impaired test performance. Besides the operant conditioning, we investigated the animals' habituation to a novel environment by repeated open field exposure. In the first run, animals showed exploratory behavior and thus a high locomotor activity was observed (63.6 +/- 10.7 crossed squares). Upon a second exposure, all animals immediately moved into one corner and locomotion ceased (7.2 +/- 1.9 crossed squares). This habituation was not altered even after hibernation (6.1 +/- 1.1 crossed squares). We thus conclude that long-term memory is unaffected by hibernation in Alpine marmots. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available