4.6 Review

SEPSIS: MULTIPLE ABNORMALITIES, HETEROGENEOUS RESPONSES, AND EVOLVING UNDERSTANDING

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
Volume 93, Issue 3, Pages 1247-1288

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00037.2012

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM82962, R01 GM97320, T32 GM86308]
  2. WWTF [LS07-065]
  3. EU Marie Curie IRG [FP7-203685]
  4. [UO1 AI075386]
  5. [U19 AI062629]
  6. [RO1 AI058107]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sepsis represents the host's systemic inflammatory response to a severe infection. It causes substantial human morbidity resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths each year. Despite decades of intense research, the basic mechanisms still remain elusive. In either experimental animal models of sepsis or human patients, there are substantial physiological changes, many of which may result in subsequent organ injury. Variations in age, gender, and medical comorbidities including diabetes and renal failure create additional complexity that influence the outcomes in septic patients. Specific system-based alterations, such as the coagulopathy observed in sepsis, offer both potential insight and possible therapeutic targets. Intracellular stress induces changes in the endoplasmic reticulum yielding misfolded proteins that contribute to the underlying pathophysiological changes. With these multiple changes it is difficult to precisely classify an individual's response in sepsis as proinflammatory or immunosuppressed. This heterogeneity also may explain why most therapeutic interventions have not improved survival. Given the complexity of sepsis, biomarkers and mathematical models offer potential guidance once they have been carefully validated. This review discusses each of these important factors to provide a framework for understanding the complex and current challenges of managing the septic patient. Clinical trial failures and the therapeutic interventions that have proven successful are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available