4.2 Article

Adaptation versus Allometry: Population and Body Mass Effects on Hypoxic Metabolism in Fundulus grandis

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ZOOLOGY
Volume 83, Issue 1, Pages 182-190

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/648482

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. [NSF/OCE 0221879]
  2. [NIH/NHLBI HL65470-01A2]
  3. [NSF-NIEHS P50ES12736]
  4. [NSF OCE-0432368]
  5. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL065470] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypoxia has significant effects on organisms, from metabolic reduction to death, and could be an important evolutionary force affecting the variation among populations within a species. To determine intraspecific variation in hypoxic metabolism and the effect of body mass, we examine rates of oxygen consumption ((M) over doto(2)) at seven oxygen concentrations among seven populations of Fundulus grandis that inhabit a mosaic of habitats with different frequencies and intensities of hypoxia. For (M) over doto(2), there is a significant interaction (P < 0.05) between body. mass and oxygen concentrations: log(10) body mass : log(10) (M) over doto(2) slopes were steeper at intermediate oxygen partial pressures (Po-2) than either normoxic or lowest Po-2 (ANCOVA, P < 0.001). Additionally, the Po-2crit (Po-2 where (M) over doto(2) can no longer be maintained) was a negative function of body mass (P < 0.04). At the lowest Po-2 (1.8 kPa), there was a significant difference in (M) over doto(2) among populations: one of the populations from environments more frequently stressed by hypoxia has greater (M) over doto(2) at the lowest oxygen concentrations. With few differences among populations, the most important effects were how body mass affected (M) over doto(2) at intermediate Po-2 and the negative relationship between body mass and Po-2crit. These findings suggest that an increase in body size is a useful strategy to minimize the effect of hypoxia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available