4.7 Review

Modified gravity and cosmology

Journal

PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 513, Issue 1-3, Pages 1-189

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.001

Keywords

General relativity; Gravitational physics; Cosmology; Modified gravity

Funding

  1. STFC
  2. CERN
  3. BIPAC
  4. Oxford Martin School
  5. Jesus College, Oxford
  6. Royal Society University Research Fellowships
  7. STFC
  8. CERN
  9. BIPAC
  10. Oxford Martin School
  11. Jesus College, Oxford
  12. Royal Society University Research Fellowships
  13. STFC [ST/H005048/2, ST/H005048/1, ST/F003110/1, ST/J000388/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  14. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H005048/2, ST/J000388/1, ST/H005048/1, ST/F003110/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this review we present a thoroughly comprehensive survey of recent work on modified theories of gravity and their cosmological consequences. Amongst other things, we cover General Relativity, scalar-tensor, Einstein-ae ther, and Bimetric theories, as well as TeVeS, f(R), general higher-order theories, Horava-Lifschitz gravity, Galileons, Ghost Condensates, and models of extra dimensions including Kaluza-Klein, Randall-Sundrum, DGP, and higher co-dimension braneworlds. We also review attempts to construct a Parameterised Post-Friedmannian formalism, that can be used to constrain deviations from General Relativity in cosmology, and that is suitable for comparison with data on the largest scales. These subjects have been intensively studied over the past decade, largely motivated by rapid progress in the field of observational cosmology that now allows, for the first time, precision tests of fundamental physics on the scale of the observable Universe. The purpose of this review is to provide a reference tool for researchers and students in cosmology and gravitational physics, as well as a self-contained, comprehensive and up-to-date introduction to the subject as a whole. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available