4.4 Article

Adiabatic temperature profile in the mantle

Journal

PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS
Volume 183, Issue 1-2, Pages 212-218

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2010.07.001

Keywords

Geotherm; Mantle; Adiabatic temperature gradient; Thermal expansion; Seismic discontinuity

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [16075207, 17204036]
  2. Institute for Study of the Earth's Interior, Okayama University
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17204036, 16075207] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The temperature at the 410-km discontinuity is re-evaluated by comparing the depth of the discontinuity with the olivine-wadsleyite transition pressure obtained using in situ X-ray diffraction experiments by Katsura et al. (2004a) and equation of state (EoS) of MgO by Tange et al. (2009) (Tange scale) and Matsui et al. (2000). The newly estimated temperature is 1830 +/- 48 K, 70 K higher than that by our previous estimation. The EoSes of the major mantle minerals (olivine, wadsleyite, ringwoodite and perovskite) are also recalculated using the Tange scale. The adiabatic temperature gradient is calculated using the thermal expansion coefficient obtained from these EoSes. The adiabatic temperature gradient gradually decreases with increasing depth without a phase transition, and abruptly increases in association with phase transitions. The adiabatic temperature gradients are found to be 04-0.5 and 0.3 K/km in the upper and lower parts of the mantle, respectively. The temperatures at a depth of 200 km, the bottom of the mantle transition zone, the top of the lower mantle and a depth of 2700 km are found to be 1720 +/- 40, 2010 +/- 40, 1980 +/- 40, and 2730 +/- 50 K. The mantle potential temperature is found to be 1610 +/- 35 K. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available