4.4 Article

Dense plasma heating and Gbar shock formation by a high intensity flux of energetic electrons

Journal

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.4811473

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EURATOM
  2. Aquitaine Region Council
  3. HiPER Project within the FP7 European Union Program
  4. French National Agency of Research [ANR-2011-BS04-014]
  5. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [12-02-92101-JF]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Process of shock ignition in inertial confinement fusion implies creation of a high pressure shock with a laser spike having intensity of the order of a few PW/cm(2). However, the collisional (Bremsstrahlung) absorption at these intensities is inefficient and a significant part of laser energy is converted in a stream of energetic electrons. The process of shock formation in a dense plasma by an intense electron beam is studied in this paper in a planar geometry. The energy deposition takes place in a fixed mass target layer with the areal density determined by the electron range. A self-similar isothermal rarefaction wave of a fixed mass describes the expanding plasma. Formation of a shock wave in the target under the pressure of expanding plasma is described. The efficiency of electron beam energy conversion into the shock wave energy depends on the fast electron energy and the pulse duration. The model is applied to the laser produced fast electrons. The fast electron energy transport could be the dominant mechanism of ablation pressure creation under the conditions of shock ignition. The shock wave pressure exceeding 1 Gbar during 200-300 ps can be generated with the electron pulse intensity in the range of 5-10 PW/cm(2). The conclusions of theoretical model are confirmed in numerical simulations with a radiation hydrodynamic code coupled with a fast electron transport module. (C) 2013 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available