4.8 Article

A comparison of iodinated trihalomethane formation from chlorine, chlorine dioxide and potassium permanganate oxidation processes

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 394-403

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.040

Keywords

Iodinated trihalomethanes (I-THMs); Chlorine; Chlorine dioxide; Potassium permanganate; Disinfection by-product; Water treatment

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China in China [51278352, 41301536]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. National Major Science and Technology Project of China [2012ZX07404004, 2012ZX07408001]
  4. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC-102-2221-E-327-021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the formation of iodinated trihalomethanes (I-THMs) from iodide-containing raw waters oxidized by chlorine, chlorine dioxide (ClO2) and potassium permanganate (KMnO4) at different oxidant concentrations, reaction times, pHs, initial iodide concentrations and bromide to iodide mass ratios. Among the six investigated I-THMs, iodoform was the major species formed during the oxidation using chlorine, ClO2 and KMnO4. When oxidant concentration increased from 0.1 to 3.0 mg/L, the formation of I-THMs increased and then decreased for chlorine and ClO2, but kept increasing for KMnO4. As the reaction time went by, I-THM concentration increased to a plateau within 10 h (ClO2 within only 1 h, especially) for all the three oxidants. I-THM formation gradually increased from pH 3.0 to 9.0 and remained stable at pH values higher than 7.5 for chlorine; however, for ClO2 and KMnO4 the highest I-THM formation showed at pH 7.0 and 7.5, respectively. As initial iodide concentration increased from 20 to 800 mu g/L, the total amount and species of I-THMs increased for the three oxidants. Iodide contributed to I-THM formation much more significantly than bromide. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available