4.4 Article

Influence of Coulomb collisions on the structure of reconnection layers

Journal

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.3191718

Keywords

Fokker-Planck equation; magnetic reconnection; Monte Carlo methods; plasma collision processes; plasma simulation; plasma transport processes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of Coulomb collisions on the structure of reconnection layers is examined in neutral sheet geometry using fully kinetic simulations with a Monte Carlo treatment of the Fokker-Planck operator. The algorithm is first carefully benchmarked against key predictions from transport theory, including the parallel and perpendicular resistivities as well as the thermal force. The results demonstrate that the collisionality is accurately specified, thus allowing the initial Lundquist number to be chosen as desired. For modest Lundquist numbers S less than or similar to 1000, the classic Sweet-Parker solution is recovered. Furthermore, a distinct transition to a faster kinetic regime is observed when the thickness of the resistive layer delta(SP) falls below the ion inertial length d(i). For higher Lundquist numbers S greater than or similar to 1000, plasmoids (secondary islands) are observed within the elongated resistive layers. These plasmoids give rise to a measurable increase in the reconnection rate and for certain cases induce a transition to kinetic regimes sooner than expected from the delta(SP)approximate to d(i) condition. During this transition, the reconnection electric field exceeds the runaway limit, leading to electron scale current layers in which the nonideal electric field is supported predominantly by off-diagonal components in the electron pressure tensor, along with a residual contribution from electron-ion momentum exchange. These weakly collisional electron layers are also unstable to the formation of new plasmoids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available