4.7 Article

Feedback control of the vortex-shedding instability based on sensitivity analysis

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3481148

Keywords

channel flow; control system synthesis; external flows; feedback; flow control; flow instability; flow measurement; flow sensors; jets; Poiseuille flow; proportional control; velocity measurement; vortices; wakes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present work, a simple proportional feedback control is designed to suppress the vortex-shedding instability in the wake of a prototype bluff-body flow, i.e., the flow around a square cylinder confined in a channel with an incoming Poiseuille flow. Actuation is provided by two jets localized on the cylinder surface and velocity sensors are used for feedback control. This particular configuration is a pretext to propose a more general strategy for designing a controller, which is independent of the type of actuation and sensors. The method is based on the linear stability analysis of the flow, carried out on the unstable steady solution of the equations, which is also the target flow of the control. The idea is to use sensitivity analysis to predict the displacement in the complex plane of some selected eigenvalues, found by the linear stability analysis of the flow, as a function of the control design parameters. In this paper, it is shown that the information provided by only sensitivity analysis carried out on the uncontrolled system is not sufficient to design a controller which stabilizes the flow. Therefore, the control is designed iteratively by successive linearizations. Apart from possible constraints, the position of the sensors, the direction along which velocity is measured, and the feedback coefficients are outputs of the design procedure. The proposed strategy leads to a successful control up to a Reynolds number which is at least twice as large as the critical one for the primary instability, using only one velocity sensor. (C) 2010 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3481148]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available