4.7 Article

The LO and the NLO unintegrated parton distributions in the modified DGLAP formalism

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 708, Issue 1-2, Pages 75-86

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.01.020

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research Council of University of Tehran
  2. Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The leading order (LO) and the next-to-leading order (NLO) unintegrated parton distribution functions (UPDF) are calculated by using the latest version of integrated parton distribution functions (PDF) of Martin et al. (MSTW2008) as the inputs. Similar to our previous works, rather than the Ciafaloni-Catani-Fiorani-Marchesini (CCFM) evolution equations, the Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi (DGLAP) collinear approximation is used to consider the dependence of parton distributions on the second scale, k(t)(2), the partons transverse momenta, beside the first scale, mu(2), which is included in the last step of DGLAP evolution equation (Kimber et al. procedure). The three-dimensional UPDF are presented in terms of different [x, mu(2)]-planes and in the range of CERN LHC energies and the parametrization procedure for the various values of k(t)(2). It is shown that the two-scale UPDF behave similar to their corresponding PDF at large k(t)(2) similar or equal to 10(6) GeV2. In both LO and NLO levels at each k(t)(2) a peak is observed around mu(2) = k(t)(2) especially at x similar or equal to 10(-4) (x <= 10(-4)) for the gluons (quarks). In contrast to the complication which exists in the parameterized PDF i.e. the negative gluon distribution at small x and mu(2), the UPDF are always positive except at large x (similar or equal to 1) which is mainly due to the angular ordering which makes numerical instability in this region (the values of UPDF are very small). We hope present results could help a better understanding of the LHC data at CERN. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available