4.7 Article

Constraints on f(R) cosmologies from strong gravitational lensing systems

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 714, Issue 1, Pages 1-5

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.06.062

Keywords

f(R) gravity; Strong lensing; Cosmological constraints

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10825313]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology National Basic Science Program (Project 973) [2012CB821804]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Scientific Research Foundation of Beijing Normal University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

f(R) gravity is thought to be an alternative to dark energy which can explain the acceleration of the universe. It has been tested by different observations including type la supernovae (SNIa), the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) and so on. In this Letter, we use the Hubble constant independent ratio between two angular diameter distances D = Dls/Ds to constrain f(R) model in Palatini approach f(R) = R - alpha H-0(2)(-R/H-0(2))(R). These data are from various large systematic lensing surveys and lensing by galaxy clusters combined with X-ray observations. We also combine the lensing data with CMB and BAO, which gives a stringent constraint. The best-fit results are (alpha, beta) = (-1.50,0.696) or (Omega(m), beta = (0.0734.0.696) using lensing data only. When combined with CMB and BAO, the best-fit results are (alpha, beta) = (-3.75.0.0651) or (Omega(m), beta)= (0.286, 0.0651). If we further fix beta = 0 (corresponding to Lambda CDM), the best-fit value for alpha is alpha = -4.84(-0.68)(+0.91) (1 sigma)(-0.98)(+0.63)(2 sigma) for the lensing analysis and alpha = -4.35(-0.16)(+0.18) (1 sigma)(-0.25)(+0.3)(2 sigma) for the combined data, respectively. Our results show that ACDM model is within la range. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available