4.7 Article

Quadrupole moments of collective structures up to spin ∼65(h)over-bar in 157Er and 158Er: A challenge for understanding triaxiality in nuclei

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 702, Issue 2-3, Pages 127-130

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.07.007

Keywords

Ultrahigh-spin collective structures; Transition quadrupole moments; Cranked Nilsson-Strutinsky calculations; Triaxial nuclear shape

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [PHY-0756474, PHY-0554762, PHY-0754674]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-AC02-06CH11357, DE-FG02-94ER40834, DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-FG02-96ER40983]
  3. United Kingdom Science and Technology Facilities Council
  4. Swedish Science Research Council
  5. State of Florida
  6. STFC [ST/J000094/1, ST/F004192/1, ST/J000108/1, ST/I504959/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I504959/1, ST/F004192/1, PP/F000677/1, ST/J000094/1, EP/C51646X/1, ST/J000108/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Division Of Physics
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1064819] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The transition quadrupole moments. Q(t), of four weakly populated collective bands up to spin similar to 65h in Er-157,Er-158 have been measured to be similar to II eb demonstrating that these sequences are associated with large deformations. However, the data are inconsistent with calculated values from cranked Nilsson-Strutinsky calculations that predict the lowest energy triaxial shape to be associated with rotation about the short principal axis. The data appear to favor either a stable triaxial shape rotating about the intermediate axis or, alternatively, a triaxial shape with larger deformation rotating about the short axis. These new results challenge the present understanding of triaxiality in nuclei. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available