4.7 Article

Effects of transversity in deep-inelastic scattering by polarized protons

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 693, Issue 1, Pages 11-16

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2010.08.012

Keywords

Semi-inclusive DIS; Single-spin asymmetries; Polarized structure functions; Transversity; Collins function

Funding

  1. Ministry of Economy
  2. Ministry of Education and Science of Armenia
  3. FWO-Flanders and IWT, Belgium
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung
  7. German Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)
  8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  9. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN)
  10. MEXT
  11. JSPS
  12. G-COE of Japan
  13. Dutch Foundation
  14. Russian Academy of Science
  15. Russian Federal Agency for Science and Innovations
  16. U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  17. Science and Technology Facilities Council
  18. Scottish Universities Physics Alliance
  19. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  20. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  21. European Community [227431]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Single-spin asymmetries for pions and charged kaons are measured in semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering of positrons and electrons off a transversely nuclear-polarized hydrogen target. The dependence of the cross section on the azimuthal angles of the target polarization (phi s) and the produced hadron (phi) is found to have a substantial sin(phi +phi s) modulation for the production of pi(+), pi(-) and K+. This Fourier component can be interpreted in terms of non-zero transversity distribution functions and non-zero favored and disfavored Collins fragmentation functions with opposite sign. For pi(0) and K- production the amplitude of this Fourier component is consistent with zero. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available