4.7 Article

Limits on inelastic dark matter from ZEPLIN-III

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 692, Issue 3, Pages 180-183

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2010.07.042

Keywords

Inelastic dark matter; WIMPs; Xenon

Funding

  1. Science & Technology Facilities Council
  2. ITEP
  3. ICL
  4. Russian Foundation of Basic Research [08-02-91851 KO a]
  5. Royal Society
  6. Fundacao para Ciencia e Tecnologia [CERN/FP/83501/2008, CERN/FP/109320/2009, SFRH/BPD/27054/2006, SFRH/BPD/47320/2008]
  7. SC Rosatom
  8. Russian Ministry of Education and Science [02.740.11.0239]
  9. [SS-1329.2008.2]
  10. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/27054/2006, CERN/FP/83501/2008, CERN/FP/109320/2009, SFRH/BPD/47320/2008] Funding Source: FCT
  11. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I000070/1, ST/I000011/1, ST/H004238/1, PP/E006841/1, ST/F007078/1, PP/E00685X/1, ST/I006161/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. STFC [ST/I000011/1, ST/H004238/1, ST/I000070/1, PP/E006841/1, PP/E00685X/1, ST/F007078/1, ST/I006161/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present limits on the WIMP-nucleon cross section for inelastic dark matter from a reanalysis of the 2008 run of ZEPLIN-III. Cuts, notably on scintillation pulse shape and scintillation-to-ionisation ratio, give a net exposure of 63 kg day in the range 20-80 key nuclear recoil energy, in which 6 events are observed. Upper limits on signal rate are derived from the maximum empty patch in the data. Under standard halo assumptions a small region of parameter space consistent, at 99% CL, with causing the 1.17 ton yr DAMA modulation signal is allowed at 90% CL: it is in the mass range 45-60 GeV c(-2) with a minimum CL of 87%, again derived from the maximum patch. This is the tightest constraint yet presented using xenon, a target nucleus whose similarity to iodine mitigiates systematic error from the assumed halo. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available