4.7 Article

Measurement of differential Z/γ* plus jet plus X cross sections in p(p)over-bar collisions at √S=1.96 TeV

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 669, Issue 5, Pages 278-286

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.09.060

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DOE
  2. NSF
  3. CEA
  4. FAPERJ
  5. FAPESP
  6. FUNDUNESP (Brazil)
  7. DAE
  8. DST (India)
  9. Colciencias (Colombia)
  10. CONACyT (Mexico)
  11. KRF
  12. KOSEF (Korea)
  13. CONICET
  14. UBACyT (Argentina)
  15. FOM (The Netherlands)
  16. STFC (United Kingdom)
  17. MSMT
  18. GACR (Czech Republic)
  19. CRC Program
  20. CFI
  21. NSERC
  22. WestGrid Project (Canada)
  23. BMBF
  24. DFG (Germany)
  25. SFI (Ireland)
  26. The Swedish Research Council (Sweden)
  27. CAS
  28. CNSF (China)
  29. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Germany)
  30. STFC [ST/F007418/1, ST/F00754X/1, PP/E000487/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  31. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E000487/1, ST/F007418/1, ST/F00754X/1, PP/D004284/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present new measurements of differential cross sections for Z/gamma* (-> mu mu) + jet + X production in a 1 fb(-1) data sample collected with the DO detector in p (p) over bar collisions at root s = 1.96 TeV. Results include the first measurements differential in the Z/gamma* transverse momentum and rapidity, as well as new measurements differential in the leading jet transverse momentum and rapidity. Next-to-leading order perturbative QCD predictions are compared to the measurements, and reasonable agreement is observed, except in the region of low Z/gamma* transverse momentum. Predictions from two event generators based on matrix elements and parton showers, and one pure parton shower event generator are also compared to the measurements. These show significant overall normalization differences to the data and have varied success in describing the shape of the distributions. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available