4.6 Article

Proton beam characterization by proton-induced acoustic emission: simulation studies

Journal

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 21, Pages 6549-6582

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6549

Keywords

pulsed proton beam; range verification; acoustic pulses; monitoring of dose distribution; radiation therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to their Bragg peak, proton beams are capable of delivering a targeted dose of radiation to a narrow volume, but range uncertainties currently limit their accuracy. One promising beam characterization technique, protoacoustic range verification, measures the acoustic emission generated by the proton beam. We simulated the pressure waves generated by proton radiation passing through water. We observed that the proton-induced acoustic signal consists of two peaks, labeled alpha and gamma, with two originating sources. The alpha acoustic peak is generated by the pre-Bragg peak heated region whereas the source of the gamma acoustic peak is the proton Bragg peak. The arrival time of the alpha and gamma peaks at a transducer reveals the distance from the beam propagation axis and Bragg peak center, respectively. The maximum pressure is not observed directly above the Bragg peak due to interference of the acoustic signals. Range verification based on the arrival times is shown to be more effective than determining the Bragg peak position based on pressure amplitudes. The temporal width of the alpha and gamma peaks are linearly proportional to the beam diameter and Bragg peak width, respectively. The temporal separation between compression and rarefaction peaks is proportional to the spill time width. The pressure wave expected from a spread out Bragg peak dose is characterized. The simulations also show that acoustic monitoring can verify the proton beam dose distribution and range by characterizing the Bragg peak position to within similar to 1 mm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available