4.6 Review

A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology

Journal

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 21, Pages R119-R159

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/R119

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK (CRUK)
  2. EPSRC
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G026483/1]
  4. UK Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
  5. EPSRC [EP/G026483/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G026483/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate quantification in PET and SPECT requires correction for a number of physical factors, such as photon attenuation, Compton scattering and random coincidences (in PET). Another factor affecting quantification is the limited spatial resolution. While considerable effort has gone into development of routine correction techniques for the former factors, less attention has been paid to the latter. Spatial resolution-related effects, referred to as 'partial volume effects' (PVEs), depend not only on the characteristics of the imaging system but also on the object and activity distribution. Spatial and/or temporal variations in PVE can often be confounding factors. Partial volume correction (PVC) could in theory be achieved by some kind of inverse filtering technique, reversing the effect of the system PSF. However, these methods are limited, and usually lead to noise-amplification or image artefacts. Some form of regularization is therefore needed, and this can be achieved using information from co-registered anatomical images, such as CT or MRI. The purpose of this paper is to enhance understanding of PVEs and to review possible approaches for PVC. We also present a review of clinical applications of PVC within the fields of neurology, cardiology and oncology, including specific examples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available