4.6 Article

A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer

Journal

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 17, Pages 5753-5769

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/17/018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NCI 1R01CA129961, NCI 1U01CA142565, NCI 1P50 098131, NCI P30 CA68485]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) data requires the accurate determination of the arterial input function (AIF). A novel method for obtaining the AIF is presented here and pharmacokinetic parameters derived from individual and population-based AIFs are then compared. A Philips 3.0 T Achieva MR scanner was used to obtain 20 DCE-MRI data sets from ten breast cancer patients prior to and after one cycle of chemotherapy. Using a semi-automated method to estimate the AIF from the axillary artery, we obtain the AIF for each patient, AIF(ind), and compute a population-averaged AIF, AIF(pop). The extended standard model is used to estimate the physiological parameters using the two types of AIFs. The mean concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for the AIFs segmented manually and by the proposed AIF tracking approach is 0.96, indicating accurate and automatic tracking of an AIF in DCE-MRI data of the breast is possible. Regarding the kinetic parameters, the CCC values for K-trans, v(p) and v(e) as estimated by AIF(ind) and AIF(pop) are 0.65, 0.74 and 0.31, respectively, based on the region of interest analysis. The average CCC values for the voxel-by-voxel analysis are 0.76, 0.84 and 0.68 for K-trans, v(p) and v(e), respectively. This work indicates that K-trans and v(p) show good agreement between AIF(pop) and AIF(ind) while there is a weak agreement on v(e).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available