4.6 Article

Numerical study of RF exposure and the resulting temperature rise in the foetus during a magnetic resonance procedure

Journal

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages 913-930

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/4/001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/D050766/1]
  2. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H046410/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [MC_U120061309] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/H046410/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [MC_U120061309] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numerical simulations of specific absorption rate (SAR) and temperature changes in a 26-week pregnant woman model within typical birdcage body coils as used in 1.5 T and 3 T MRI scanners are described. Spatial distributions of SAR and the resulting spatial and temporal changes in temperature are determined using a finite difference time domain method and a finite difference bio-heat transfer solver that accounts for discrete vessels. Heat transfer from foetus to placenta via the umbilical vein and arteries as well as that across the foetal skin/amniotic fluid/uterinewall boundaries is modelled. Results suggest that for procedures compliant with IEC normal mode conditions (maternal whole-body averaged SAR(MWB) <= 2 W kg(-1) (continuous or time-averaged over 6 min)), whole foetal SAR, local foetal SAR(10g) and average foetal temperature are within international safety limits. For continuous RF exposure at SAR(MWB) = 2 W kg(-1) over periods of 7.5 min or longer, a maximum local foetal temperature > 38 degrees C may occur. However, assessment of the risk posed by such maximum temperatures predicted in a static model is difficult because of frequent foetal movement. Results also confirm that when SAR(MWB) = 2 W kg(-1), some local SAR(10g) values in the mother's trunk and extremities exceed recommended limits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available