4.6 Article

Instrument for determining the complex shear modulus of soft-tissue-like materials from 10 to 300 Hz

Journal

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 19, Pages 5313-5342

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/19/004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [T32 CA009206, T32 CA009206-29, R01 CA100373-05, T32 CA009206-21, T32CA09206, T32 CA009206-23, R01 CA100373, T32 CA009206-27, T32 CA009206-28, T32 CA009206-30, T32 CA009206-24, T32 CA009206-26, R01 CA100373-04, T32 CA009206-20, R01 CA100373-01A1, R01CA100373, T32 CA009206-22, T32 CA009206-25, R01 CA100373-02, R01 CA100373-03] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB000459, R01 EB000459-01, R01 EB000459-02, R01EB000459, R01 EB000459-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate determination of the complex shear modulus of soft tissues and soft-tissue-like materials in the 10-300 Hz frequency range is very important to researchers in MR elastography and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging. A variety of instruments for making such measurements has been reported, but none of them is easily reproduced, and none have been tested to conform to causality via the Kramers-Kronig (K-K) relations. A promising linear oscillation instrument described in a previous brief report operates between 20 and 160 Hz, but results were not tested for conformity to the K-K relations. We have produced a similar instrument with our own version of the electronic components and have also accounted for instrumental effects on the data reduction, which is not addressed in the previous report. The improved instrument has been shown to conform to an accurate approximation of the K-K relations over the 10-300 Hz range. The K-K approximation is based on the Weichert mechanical circuit model. We also found that the sample thickness must be small enough to obtain agreement with a calibrated commercial rheometer. A complete description of the improved instrument is given, facilitating replication in other labs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available