4.5 Article

Landslide susceptibility assessment of the Kralovany-Liptovsky Mikulas railway case study

Journal

PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH
Volume 35, Issue 3-5, Pages 162-171

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2009.12.002

Keywords

Landslide susceptibility assessment; Parametric maps; Statistical methods - bivariate statistical analysis; Entropy index; Geographic Information System (GIS); Line structures

Funding

  1. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-0158-06]
  2. Comenius University in Bratislava [UK/323/2008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper deals with bivariate statistical landslide susceptibility assessment for the territory of the Kralovany-Liptovsky Mikulas railway case study. Bivariate statistical analysis with weight determination of each input parametric map, based on entropy index calculation, within the Geographical Information Systems (GIS) environment has been used, since bivariate and multivariate analyses are the most commonly used statistical methods. For the statistical assessment of landslide susceptibility, aerial entities of the main scarps were taken for bivariate analysis. The evaluated area presents an irregular buffer, delimited by the Vah River watershed, and it spreads 50 km along the railway between Kralovany and Liptovsky Mikulas townships in the Slovak Republic. The effectiveness of landslide susceptibility assessment using GIS and statistics is based on appropriate selection of the geological factors which play a dominant role in slope stability. In this case study, five factors influencing slope stability are evaluated - lithology, slope aspect, slope angle, hypsographic level and actual landuse. These factors were prepared in vector form (parametric maps) and subsequently processed to the raster form. Bivariate statistical analysis was used to construct the final prognostic landslide susceptibility map. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available