4.5 Article

Probabilistic characterization of drought properties through copulas

Journal

PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH
Volume 34, Issue 10-12, Pages 596-605

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2008.09.004

Keywords

Drought; Standardized Precipitation Index; Copula; Return period; Sicily

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper shows an application of copulas to the probabilistic analysis of drought characteristics. Drought occurrences are analyzed by the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) computed on the mean areal precipitation, aggregated at 6 months, observed in Sicily between 1921 and 2003. Assuming a drought period as a consecutive number of intervals where SPI values are less than -1, several characteristics are determined, namely: drought length, mean and minimum SPI values, and drought mean areal extent. Results of a preliminary analysis based on Kendall's correlation and upper tail dependence coefficient, computed on observed and resampled data, show significant dependence properties between almost all the considered pairs. The four-dimensional joint distribution required to correctly model the stochastic structure of variables is determined by resorting to copula approach. This allows flexibility in choosing suitable marginals and dependence structure, and in simplifying the inference procedure as well. Drought return periods are then computed as mean interarrival time, taking into account two drought characteristics at a time by means of the corresponding bivariate marginals of the fitted four-dimensional distribution. Application of the proposed methodology to Sicilian precipitation series shows a good correspondence between empirical and theoretical joint return periods, thus indicating that copulas are adequate to jointly model drought characteristics and to compute exceedance probabilities of drought events. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available