Journal
PHYSICAL THERAPY
Volume 94, Issue 11, Pages 1594-1603Publisher
AMER PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOC
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20130596
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background. The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) is commonly used to measure walking balance. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) has yet to be determined for the FGA. Objective. The purposes of this study were to determine: (1) the MCID in the FGA for older community-dwelling adults relative to patients' and physical therapists' estimates of change and (2) the extent of agreement between patients' and physical therapists' estimates of change. Design. This study was a prospective case series. Methods. Patients and physical therapists rated the amount of change in balance while walking after an episode of physical therapy for balance retraining on a 15-point global rating of change (GROC) scale. Weighted kappa statistics were calculated to express agreement between patients' and physical therapists' GROC ratings. Functional Gait Assessment change scores were plotted on receiver operating characteristic curves. A cutoff of +3 on the GROC was the criterion used for important change. The optimal FGA change cutoff score for MCID was determined, and sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), and likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated. Results. One hundred thirty-five community-dwelling older adults (average age = 78.8 years) and 14 physical therapists participated. There was poor agreement between the patients' and therapists' ratings of change (weighted kappa = .163). The estimated MCID value for the FGA using physical therapists' ratings of change as an anchor was 4 points (SN = 0.66, SP = 0.84, LR+ = 4.07, LR = 0.40). No accurate value for the FGA MCID could be determined based on the patients' ratings of change. Limitations. The small sample size was a limitation. Conclusion. Poor agreement between therapists' and patients' ratings indicate the need for further communication relative to patient goals. The 4-point MCID value for the FGA can be used for goal setting, tracking patient progress, and program evaluation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available